Penginapan Murah di Pusat Kota Semarang

Phil Ivey Eyes Healthcare Marijuana Biz for Newest Partnership

Phil Ivey Eyes Healthcare Marijuana Biz for Newest Partnership

Poker superstar Phil Ivey has received preliminary approval for A las vegas medical marijuana dispensary license in Nevada.

Phil Ivey isn’t smoking one thing, but their future clients may be: Ivey received one of 26 initial license approvals for the medical cannabis dispensary through the Las vegas, nevada City Council earlier this week, possibly making the poker superstar one of the first operators into the town to supply pot to consumers.

You will find still further actions necessary before Ivey gets last approval to start such a company, but his approval does suggest that the city found him qualified to go on in the licensing procedure.

This week to plead their cases for medical marijuana licenses about 50 potential operators went before the City Council. Those that got approval that is preliminary the city will now have to also be approved by the state health department.

The City Council will sooner or later hold a suitability that is final for those approved by the state before awarding a small number of licenses that have been set aside for Las Vegas.

Which means that Ivey still has a long way to go before obtaining a last go-ahead to dispense medical marijuana in Sin City. But if he can make their way through the various licensing stages, Ivey might end up slinging weed just as prolifically as he makes pot-sized bets at the poker table.

Council Split on Licensing Process

There has been a great deal of controversy over just how nevada has handled the pot licensing process, though which has more to do with procedural questions than anything Ivey or every other licensee that is potential done.

Councilman Bob Coffin introduced a motion to postpone the proceedings until after Nevada regulators weigh in on the suitability of each of the applicants a few weeks. He worried that making public opinions on applicants before the state made its own guidelines could possibly lead to lawsuits, and that waiting could permit the city to approach the problem with an ‘unbiased eye.’

But that motion ultimately failed, as a vote regarding the issue completed in a 3-3 tie. Councilwoman Lois Tarkanian and councilman Ricki Barlow also voted to delay the proceedings, while Mayor Carolyn Goodman, wife of infamous ex-mayor Oscar and mother of an applicatant by herself, abstained from the vote.

Among the many applicants that had been approved were developer James Hammer, restaurant owner Michael Morton, and political consultant David Thomas. Nuleaf, a Las Vegas-based company that is owned by a team that operates dispensaries in California, was denied for a license.

‘I believe waiting might have made a difference,’ Nuleaf spokesman Bradley Mayer said. ‘We feel confident that hawaii will find we’re a very qualified applicant.’

Ivey Headliner of the Year

That is simply the most recent in a string of headlines made by Ivey that have nothing in connection with his skills that are prodigious the poker table.

Possibly the biggest headlines happen made in their various cases that are edge-sorting Crockfords and the Borgata. Ivey currently destroyed the Crockfords case in the united kingdom’s tall Court of Justice, costing him over $12 million in winnings. a case that is similar the Atlantic City casino is still pending, although in that case, it’s the casino that is pursuing recourse to have its payouts came back. Ivey contends that the techniques he utilized in the games do not constitute cheating, while the casinos, not surprisingly, disagree.

Final Saturday, Ivey also shut down the Ivey Poker site, ending operations just 18 months after the Facebook poker program launched. However, the poker legend said that the closed down ended up being just a change for the product.

Southern Africa Online Gambling Ban Stirs Debate

South Africa is considering a ban on online gambling, also stronger laws for land-based wagering, such as electronic bingo terminals like these. (Image:

South Africa’s government is proposing a ban on a range that is wide of activities, including all forms of online gambling and other activities such as dog racing. That proposal is being discussed by the National Gambling Policy Council, which features members from both the national and provincial governments, as well as the Department of Trade and Industry.

According to department officials, the us government believes it has the capability to enforce regulations on gambling, and that it is unclear how many jobs are created by the online gambling industry. It could additionally barely be an unprecedented move, as many other jurisdictions across the world have outlawed online gambling into the past.

Democratic Alliance Favors Regulation Over Ban

But while many government officials had been enthusiastic in regards to the prospect, the notion of an outright ban was highly denounced by the opposition Democratic Alliance.

‘That is a very, extremely decision that is bad’ said DA trade and industry spokesperson Geordin Hill-Lewis. ‘we fiercely disagree with that view. It really is completely shortsighted to say that it is better for South Africans to not be allowed to gamble online if you have demand that is patently significant the country to do that. It is for government to facilitate that into the safest way possible.’

The DA position is free slot games quick hits that online gambling is better controlled through regulation, rather than an outright ban in other words. a ban that is full Hill-Lewis said, would price far excessively in resources to enforce.

But Department of Trade and Industry Deputy Director-General Zodwa Ntuli stated that the specific circumstances in South Africa meant that a ban would be good public policy. She pointed away that the division’s proposal was made after recognizing that South Africa had a level that is relatively high of gambling and debt contrasted with many nations.

Electronic Bingo Terminals Would Be Limited

If the department’s recommendations were to become law, it wouldn’t trigger a ban that is widespread of gambling tasks in the country, but would rather restrict just what is allowed associated with old-fashioned types of gaming that are already present in South Africa. There would be further controls placed on electronic bingo terminals, which are presently allowed by provincial governments, even though there is no nationwide policy on the machines.

That conflict caused Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies to issue a moratorium on any licenses that are further the machines. The new suggestions would notice a cap on the amount of machines allowed nationwide. It would additionally you will need to get a grip on the simplicity of access to these machines, with officials saying that gambling must not be allowed in shopping centers, for instance.

The new regulations would likewise incorporate a framework for allowing the government to higher oversee the horse industry that is racing. While few details were available, it appeared that probably the most significant changes there would come in the issuing of licenses, a procedure by which the us government could affect change in the industry.

Gambling legislation in South Africa resembles that for the United States and Canada, at least in terms of the interplay between federal and governments that are local. While the government that is federal national policy, it is as much as individual provinces to decide how each will issue licenses and collect revenues from gambling activities.

Tuesday Massachusetts Casino Repeal Vote Takes Place

Despite long odds, anti-casino forces are still hoping for a victory in Massachusetts. A ‘yes’ vote means ‘no gambling enterprises’. (Image: Repeal the Casino Deal)

A vote that will either lead to Massachusetts casino repeal or to the matter being put to bed forever is coming on Tuesday, though it would take a major upset for anti-casino advocates to get their way on Election Day. Those seeking to defeat casinos are confusingly searching for voters to vote ‘Yes’ on Question 3, a proposition that could put a final end to the 2012 legislation that is allowing the state to license gaming houses over the state.

According to the survey that is latest by the Western New England University Polling Institute, 59 percent of likely voters in the state plan to vote ‘No’ on the ballot question, meaning ‘yes’ to appropriate casinos. Only 35 % plan to vote ‘yes,’ in benefit of the repeal. Those figures represent a gain that is major pro-casino forces, since a September poll showed just an 11 percent advantage for ‘no’ voters.

Of course, that’s assuming voters don’t get completely bewildered by the unintuitive ‘yes/no’ phrasing of the ballot effort itself.

Religious Voters Support Repeal

The numbers show that there has been some success in efforts by religious leaders to get parishioners to oppose the casino law, with regular churchgoers being more inclined to vote ‘yes’ than their non-attending counterparts. But even Catholics whom attend mass every week are opposed to repeal by way of a 17 % margin. In reality, Protestant voters who worship regularly make up about the only real demographic that favor repeal, doing so by a 55-45 margin.

Meanwhile, the advertising efforts by casinos and their allies seem to have been helpful. Support for the repeal in Western Massachusetts happens to be reduced considerably compared to in prior polls, possibly because of advertising that touted some great benefits of the planned MGM casino in Springfield.

Battle Over Benefits and Consequences

But while anti-casino advocates may be dealing with odds that are long Tuesday, they’re still fighting into the final moments to get their message out. Teams like Repeal the Casino Deal believe that the casinos will offer you hardly any benefit that is economic the folks of Massachusetts, while increasing criminal activity and gambling addiction.

‘ The money isn’t coming to the social people of Massachusetts,’ said Al Cabot, an anti-casino advocate. ‘This is merely cash that’s going from one or two casinos in Connecticut to three casinos in Massachusetts.’

Not surprisingly, those in the casino industry see things just a bit that is little. According to MGM Springfield President Mike Mathis, his company’s casino shall create tens of thousands of jobs and bring tens of millions of dollars in economic stimulus to town.

‘we have seen just what 25 years of no casino can do,’ Mathis said. ‘we want the possibility.’

Mathis also disputes the idea that casinos would simply be taking money that is already invested in Massachusetts and moving it to spending at his business’s resort.

‘A third of our customers are coming from Connecticut,’ Mathis said. ‘This concept that cash is falling through the sky or we’re cannibalizing the local marketplace is just inaccurate.’

Gambling enterprises in Massachusetts: Pre-Election Status

Therefore far, three licenses are granted to create gambling venues in Massachusetts. Along with the MGM casino in Springfield, Wynn Resorts was the winner of the more Boston license, beating out a competing plan by Mohegan Sun at Suffolk Downs in Revere. A license had been also awarded to Penn National to create a slots parlor in Plainridge.

While casino opponents may short come up at the polls, simply getting the question on the ballot was something of a victory. Although campaigners collected more than enough signatures to put the casino question to a referendum, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley originally rejected the relevant question, forcing a showdown in the state’s Supreme Court over whether it could ultimately appear on this year’s ballot.